Page de données généalogiques 701 (Pages Notes)

Les individus marqués d'un point rouge , sont les ancêtres directs de Estelle PARANQUE

Change: 01 JUN 2025

#Générale#HTML

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/MAINE.htm#HenryBeaumontdied1340

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/MAINE.htm#_Toc480124611

je suis https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agn%C3%A8s_de_Beaumont-au-Maine même si interrogations:

"The following person is shown separately because of doubts about her parentage[418]. Her family origin is confirmed by the 22 Jun 1305 marriage contract cited below. It is clear that Agnes was heiress of Beaumont which she brought to her husband on their marriage. There appear to be five possibilities for her father:

(1) Raoul [VII], by an unrecorded late marriage. The date of Agnes’s marriage suggests her birth around the end of Raoul [VII]’s life, considering that noble ladies often married aged around 14 at that time. Agnes was therefore unlikely to have shared the same mother as Richard [II] Vicomte de Beaumont (marriage dated to Apr 1221) or to have been the daughter of Raoul’s known wife Agnes (named in 1212). The absence of any reference to another marriage of Raoul [VII] suggests that this is the least likely possibility, although such a marriage is not impossible if Raoul's younger sons had died childless and if Richard [II] had no surviving children. If this marriage occurred, the absence of any later reference to the wife as guardian of her daughter suggests that she died soon after the birth of any child.

(2) Raoul [VII]’s son Raoul. Information about the younger Raoul is sparse. He was old enough to make donations in his own name in 1218 appears to have been alive in 1237 (see above). It is reasonable to assume that he married, despite secondary sources asserting that he died young, and that he could have had children.

(3) Raoul [VII]’s son Guillaume. It is chronologically possible that Agnes was Guillaume’s daughter, assuming that Guillaume was married and had children before he died (which seems likely). In addition, assuming that Guillaume was the son of Raoul [VII]’s wife Agnes, the younger Agnes would have been named after her paternal grandmother.

(4) another son of Raoul [VII], unrecorded in any surviving primary source, a possibility which presumably cannot be excluded.

(5) the descendant of one of Raoul [VII]’s brothers, assuming that all Raoul’s children died without surviving issue.

It is unlikely that Agnes was the daughter (or granddaughter?) of Richard [II] and his wife as there is no evidence that the couple’s descendants claimed succession to Amboise (of which Richard’s wife was heiress), although it is presumably possible that a family agreement was reached (the document no longer surviving) to compensate Agnes for renouncing her succession rights. It is also unlikely that Agnes was descended from the Beaumont family in the female line as she was named “Agnès de Beaumont” in the 22 Jun 1305 document cited above.

Two other factors may be significant, although neither swings the balance in favour of any particular possibility. Firstly, after the death of Richard [II] no reference has been found to any person holding the title vicomte de Beaumont before Louis de Brienne, which appears consistent with the absence of any surviving male heir with a claim superior to Agnes’s. Secondly, no reference has been found to any of Agnes’s maternal relatives playing any part in her guardianship or in the administration of Beaumont before her marriage, which is unexpected if any were alive at the time. "

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/MAINE.htm#AgnesBeaumontdied1301