Page de données généalogiques 635 (Pages Notes)

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SOUTHERN%20ITALY,%20PRE-NORMAN.htm#LandolfIVdied961B

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SOUTHERN%20ITALY,%20PRE-NORMAN.htm#GemmaNaplesMLandolfCapua

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SOUTHERN%20ITALY,%20PRE-NORMAN.htm#_Toc375827739

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SOUTHERN%20ITALY,%20PRE-NORMAN.htm#_Toc375827720

"Capua was awarded to Salerno when the latter's status as an autonomous principality was confirmed by the Radelgisi et Siginulfi Divisio Ducatus Beneventani, which was negotiated in early 849 by Louis II King of Italy[1427]. The town was ruled by a gastaldo who held the additional title count. The Chronicon Vulturnense records that fire destroyed the original city of Capua "Capua vetere" in 841, as well as a replacement settlement "in monticulum…Tripliscus qui alio nomine…Sicopolis", dated to [857], when a second move was made "ad pontem Cannii…civitatem qui nunc est Capua"[1428]. By about 860, the counts had severed their links with the principality of Salerno and acted autonomously. At that time the towns of Capua, Teano and Sora formed the principality of Capua, while the later Liber censuum notes the addition of Calvi, Carinola, Caserta, Sessa, Venafro and Aquino[1429]. The contemporary sources are confusing and contradictory concerning the genealogy of the counts of Capua. In addition, the numbering of the various princes is inconsistent between the sources. Precise dating is also a problem as the primary sources rarely specify precise years for events. Dating of the death and succession of the counts and princes of Capua is therefore mainly based on calculation from the number of years and months during which successive counts held the city, as reported in the list of counts of Capua (for the 9th and early 10th centuries) which is included in the Cronica de Monasterio S. Benedicti[1430]. The following reconstruction is an attempt to reconcile the various contradictions, but cannot be guaranteed as correct. "

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SOUTHERN%20ITALY,%20PRE-NORMAN.htm#_Toc375827739

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SOUTHERN%20ITALY,%20PRE-NORMAN.htm#dauSergiusIINaplesMAtenolfCapua

Naples continued to prosper under the rule of Odovacar and Theodoric, Ostrogoth kings of Italy, but the Byzantines recaptured the city after 535 which triggered a period of destruction and decline. The Lombards attacked Naples repeatedly from 581. Although Naples remained under Byzantine control, it was an enclave within Lombard-controlled territory and therefore geographically separated from the Byzantine exarch who was based at Ravenna. The first duke of Naples is recorded in the 6th century, but the accuracy of the early records is open to question. This document sets out the ducal families only from the reign of Sergius I, who established himself as duke by 840. Sico I Prince of Benevento raided Naples and captured the body of San Gennaro, the patron saint of the city[1848], but later signed the pactum Sicardi with the duchy 4 Jul 836[1849]. About a century later, a mutual help agreement, covering amongst other business defence against Muslim attacks, was signed by Naples with the Princes of Benevento, Dukes of Capua) in the 930s[1850]. Emperor Otto III captured Naples in Nov 981 and sent Duke Ioannes IV back to Germany as a prisoner in 999.

Byzantine influence remained strong in the duchy of Naples during the 9th to 12th centuries: the dating clauses of local contempory documentation invariably record timing by Byzantine imperial regnal years, the dukes of Naples used Byzantine titles, and charters record ducal visits to Constantinople.

The creation of the Norman kingdom of Sicily in 1130 led to the fall of Lombard administration in the city of Naples. After the death of Duke Sergius VII in 1137, Naples maintained its independence from the Norman kingdom for another two years, ruled by noblemen who had territorial jurisdiction within the city. However, they signed a formal act of submission to the Norman kingdom in 1139[1851].

The succession of dukes of Naples is corroborated by a list in the Chronicon Ducum…Neapolis. However, as will be seen below, there is considerable uncertainty about some of the family relationships between some of the later dukes. Similarly, the information in the primary sources relating to the wives of the dukes of Naples is sparse. "

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SOUTHERN%20ITALY,%20PRE-NORMAN.htm#_Toc375827744

"Bishop of Naples. Athanasius blinded his brother in 878 and assumed control as ATHANASIUS Duke of Naples. Erchempert records that "Sergius" was captured by "proprio germano", blinded, and exiled to Rome, dated to 878[1871]. The Chronicon Ducum…Neapolis records that "Atanasius episcopus et dux" succeeded Duke Sergius (without specifying the relationship between the two) "11 anno 11 ind" and ruled 20 years, 3 months and 29 days[1872]. Pope John VIII committed 1400 mancusis to help the coup[1873], but in 879 he excommunicated Duke Athanasius due to frustration at the latter's failure to break contact with the Muslims[1874]. Byzantium provided Duke Athanasius with troops which he used to attack Capua[1875]. Devoted to Byzantine culture, he secured and preserved for posterity many Greek manuscripts[1876]. "

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/SOUTHERN%20ITALY,%20PRE-NORMAN.htm#_Toc375827744

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CASTILE.htm#SanchoGarciadied1017A

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/toulnoreast.htm#GilbertGevaudandied1110A

http://jean.gallian.free.fr/Barral-Web/Figures/ascbaux.pdf

http://jean.gallian.free.fr/comm2/Images/genealog/Baux/pdf/p1a.pdf

http://jean.gallian.free.fr/comm2/Images/genealog/histoire/lib-p1ab.pdf

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/PROVENCE.htm#StephanetteGevaudanMRaymondIBauxdied1150

http://jean.gallian.free.fr/comm2/Images/genealog/Baux/pdf/p1a.pdf

http://jean.gallian.free.fr/comm2/Images/genealog/histoire/lib-p1ab.pdf

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/toulnoreast.htm#GilbertGevaudandied1110A

"The parentage of Gerberge Ctss de Provence has not been ascertained beyond doubt. According to the Histoire Générale de Languedoc, she was the daughter of Geoffroy [I] Comte de Provence[338]. This connection appears to be speculative, based on an idea first raised in 1664 by Honoré Bouche who, in his Histoire Chronologique de Provence a work which contains inaccuracies but does have the merit of quoting some primary sources, says over-optimistically “[je l]’estime fort vray-semblablement, par presomption et conjecture”[339]. The 28 Jul 1094 charter quoted above indicates that the widow of Comte Geoffroy [I] was representing this branch of the Provence comital family, acting presumably on behalf of her descendant Gerberge who must then have still been under age. Although Gerberge was therefore most likely descended from Geoffroy [I], the chronology of her life suggests the improbability that she was his daughter. The birth of Gerberge´s two daughters, probably dated to the late 1090s (her younger daughter Douce is called “puella” in the 3 Feb 1112 charter quoted below), suggests that Gerberge herself would have been born in [1070/84]. This date range can be narrowed further to [1078/84] if it is correct to deduce from the 28 Jul 1094 charter that Gerberge was then still under age. On the other hand, the marriage of Geoffroy [I] is dated to before 1040, Comte Geoffroy died in [1061/62], and the marriages of his other supposed children are dated to the early 1060s (see above). Szabolcs de Vajay, who assumed that Gerberge was the daughter of Geoffroy [I], suggests that she was at least 30 or 32 years old when she married (he dates the marriage to [1090]) and adds that “on peut se demander si c’était sa première alliance”[340]. However, this does not explain why Etiennette [Douce] made the donation under the charter dated 28 Jul 1094, as Gerberge (or her husband if she was already married) could have made the donation in her own name if she had been of age. Another difficulty is that, if Gerberge was the daughter of Geoffroy, the descendants of Cécile, daughter of Comte Bertrand [II] would have had a superior claim to Provence, although no evidence has been found that any such claim to the county was raised. One possibility that would solve that problem is that Gerberge was born to an otherwise unrecorded older sibling of Cécile (brother or sister) who predeceased his/her father. From a chronological point of view, the result is tight, but does not appear impossible. A further factor is introduced by Manteyer who explains the exclusion of Cécile and her descendants by stating that “la coutume de Provence oubliait, au moment de la mort de leurs parents, les filles précédemment dotées par eux”[341]. Unfortunately he cites no source on which he bases this statement. However, the examples of Gerberge’s two daughters (discussed below) and of Beatrix, daughter of Comte Raymond Berenger IV, both provide other cases which fit the pattern. If Manteyer is right, the best solution to the problem could be that Gerberge was the younger sister of Cécile. From a chronological point of view, that would also appear to be the most likely possibility for Gerberge’s parentage. If Gerberge was the granddaughter of Comte Geoffroy [I], the charter dated 28 Jul 1094 in which her grandmother acted on her behalf suggests that both of Gerberge’s parents must have been deceased at the time. "

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/PROVENCE.htm#GebergeCtsArleMGilbertGevaudandied1110A

https://gw.geneanet.org/7562519a?n=de+provence&oc=&p=gerberge&type=fiche

"The primary sources which confirm the parentage and marriages of the members of this family have not so far been identified, unless otherwise shown below. "

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/toulnoreast.htm#_Toc54592406

mais en suivant https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_vicomtes_et_comtes_de_G%C3%A9vaudan on a une ascendance possible

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/toulnoreast.htm#GilbertGevaudandied1110A

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/TOULOUSE%20NOBILITY.htm#RixendeNarbonneMRichardIIMillau

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/TOULOUSE%20NOBILITY.htm#BerenguerNarbonnedied1067A

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/CATALAN%20NOBILITY.htm#GarsendaBesaluMBerenguerINarbonne

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/TOULOUSE%20NOBILITY.htm#MatfredNarbonnedied969A

"Vicomtes de Millau are named from the 930s. From the mid-11th century it was held jointly with the vicomté of Gévaudan. The vicomté of Millau included the city of Millau {Aveyron} (Latin Amiliavum).

The primary sources which confirm the parentage and marriages of the members of this family have not so far been identified, unless otherwise shown below"

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/toulnoreast.htm#_Toc54592406

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/TOULOUSE%20NOBILITY.htm#MatfredNarbonnedied969A

https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/toulnoreast.htm#RichardeMillauMRaymondNarbonne

Page de données généalogiques 635 (Pages Notes)

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale

Retour vers la page principale